Res Ipsa Loquitur is a phrase has entered into the legal lexicon for cases under the doctrine of negligence. Common negligence is a slightly different situation. In this piece we will discuss the history and the modern approach to this interesting, and not so often discussed subject.
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Legal Implications
Res ipsa loquitur is one of the most common and important to understand part of the American legal tradition. The Latin term means “the thing that speaks for itself.” When dealing with this concept in personal injury law, this concept acts as an evidentiary rule which allows the plaintiff to organize circumstantial evidence into a claim of negligence on the defendant’s behalf. This claim would have to be rebutted by the defendant rather than the typical accusation of the defendant acting in a negligent manner intentionally.
In order to prove that the defendant acted in a negligent manner, there are many ways that the plaintiff could proceed. In some cases, the issue is open-and-shut, with clear evidence emerging of intentional misconduct. In many other cases, the lines are not as clear, and a series of circumstantial factors must be considered to show negligent behavior. In such a case, the concept of res ipsa allows the judge or jury to understand that the actions taken by the defendant can be reasonably understood to have caused the incident by their action or inaction.
Commonalities of Res Ipsa Across Jurisdictions
This acts as the so-called ‘common sense’ provision in civil cases. Most states follow this principle in determining whether the defendant caused the accident in question. Most statutes follow the concept that:
- Such an accident could only have occurred due to a person’s negligence
- This event could not have been caused by the plaintiff or third party
- The event occurred due to a breach of the defendant’s duty to the plaintiff
In these cases, the defendant must be the only person responsible for this injury. Res ipsa allows the plaintiff to array a preponderance of evidence to prove this is the case. Factors involved in this include whether or not the defendant had sole control of the object or area that caused the injury. This could be the case if the defendant allowed a walkway in their apartment building to be unsafe to walk.
Furthermore, in these cases there is a certain expectation of action of the defendant relative to the plaintiff. This could include a duty of care to prevent such an incident from occurring. If there is no such duty of care or the event does not fall within it, then this is not a res ipsa case. Such can be seen with a burglar slipping on a wet floor in a broken-into house compared to the same incident with a tenant of that property.
Defending Against Res Ipsa
When on the other side of a civil claim, the defendant may be able to defend themselves through several means. Since res ipsa is used to infer the negligence of the defendant rather than prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, defendants can show several things. One includes that such an injury could occur no matter what actions the defendant took, including acts of God.
Furthermore, if the defendant can prove that the plaintiff’s actions helped caused the event, then res ipsa does not apply. Lastly, if it can be shown that the defendant does not owe the plaintiff any duty of care or that the event occurred outside of such duty, then res ipsa is not relevant.
- Other Examples:
Examples of res ipsa can include an exploding vehicle tire or airbag while a car is travelling down the freeway. In a case like this, with possible causes including tread separation, an aftermath such as vehicle rollover speaks for itself. In cases like exploding soda and beer bottles, the bottling company would be the at fault party– as it speaks for itself.
There can be many potential defendants in res ipsa cases and a skilled attorney can determine who or what they are. Which corporations did not take the proper procedures that led to injury or accident? All of the potentially liable defendants can be identified by a law firm with the experience and background knowledge to make such a distinction on who breached their duty of reasonable care.
For More Information
For more information, please contact the legal expects at Ehline Law today. Our team of attorneys has effectively aided clients on both sides of the courtroom in res ipsa and other suits. We can help guide you through the process and offer a free consultation to discuss your options. We work on contingency, and don’t ask for any money unless we recover for you.